|
|
| Electronics
Companies Take Back Their Products in Other Countries |
| Some
of the same electronics companies who oppose producer takeback
legislation in the U.S. are complying with these same laws in
other countries, in Europe, Japan, and Canada. |
|
| IN
EUROPE: WEEE Laws Mandate Producer Takeback |
|
The
WEEE Directive (Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment)
passed in 2003 says that countries in the EU must pass laws
requiring the producers to take back a variety of household
appliances, including electronics. The deadline for implementing
WEEE laws was August 2005.
| Key
Components of WEEE |
| Financing
of electronic waste equipment |
Consumers
can return e-waste to collection points free of charge.
Individual producers bear the costs of re-use, recycling
and
disposal of all products they put on the market after
2005. Producers will be collectively responsible for taking
back historic waste. Producers can charge consumers an
additional front-end fee to cover the cost of managing
historic waste, which will vary depending on the particular
product. |
| Labeling |
Producers must clearly label their products to allow for
identification of materials
to facilitate recycling and to inform consumers that e-waste
is banned from municipal
waste and must be handled separately. |
| Product
Design and Recycling Goals |
The WEEE Directive mandates that products must be designed
for dismantling and recovery. By 2006, industry will have
to recycle or reuse between 50% and 75% of the old equipment
on the market, depending on the product category. The
Directive specifies that recycling rates will increase
over time. |
| Collection
Goals |
Manufacturers
must meet a collection rate of four kilograms (8.8 lbs)
per person per year. |
| Ban
on Hazardous Substances |
The
WEEE Directive was accompanied by a second law, the
RoHS Directive, which stands for Restriction on Hazardous
Substances. RoHS says the use of substances such as lead,
cadmium, mercury,
hexavalent chromium and certain brominated flame retardants
(PBBs, Penta-BDE,Octa-BDE, and Deca-BDE) must be phased
out by July 1, 2006. |
| Fact
Sheet on WEEE and RoHS |
Some
examples of European programs:
In
the Norwegian EPR program, adopted in March 1998, the producers
and importers pay fees to a third party organization, Elektronikkretur,
based on their current market share. These fees are internalized
in the product price and are invisible to the consumer. The
fee covers the costs of collection, transport and recycling.
Consumers are able to return their electronics free of charge.
In
Belgium, national EPR legislation for WEEE was introduced
in 2001. It allows for the use of a visible fee of some €20
for a fridge, €16 for a TV and €3-4 for a PC (fee
on PC is lower because of high inherent value of precious
metals). Revenues from the visible fees go to the producers.
Some of these revenues are used to pay local authorities and
transporters to bring WEEE to recycling facilities. The remainder
of revenues from visible fees are used by producers to build
up funds for future WEEE obligations and to pay for treating
historical waste.
How
are the companies implementing WEEE? In some countries,
companies are partnering together to implement their WEEE
obligations. One example is the European Recycling Platform
(ERP), a partnership between four companies - Hewlett Packard,
Sony, Electrolux, Braun - in several EU countries. More
on ERP.
|
| IN
JAPAN: |
|
In Japan, there are different laws for recycling TVs and for
recycling computers and monitors.
TV
Takeback: Japan passed the Home Appliance Recycling
Law in 2001, which covers TVs, refrigerators, washing
machines, and air conditioners. It specifically requires the
recycling of 55% by weight of materials from televisions collected
in the program. Under this law, producers have the responsibility
to recycle their electronic products either themselves or
delegate their responsibility to the third party. Consumers
bring their products back to retailers, or in some cases,
the municipalities. Consumers pay a recycling fee by purchasing
a recycling ticket either at the retailers or at post offices.
These fees are then transferred on a monthly basis to the
producers. The fee is standard for the type of product. However
the level of the fee is low and manufacturers absorb the difference
in received versus actual costs for recycling. This is important
to note for municipalities who may be considering simply placing
an advanced recycling fee on products and bypassing the responsibilities
of the producers. The municipality may end up picking up the
tab for costs not covered by the fee.
Computer
Takeback: In 2001, Japan passed the Law for Promotion
of Effective Utilization of Resources, which covers consumer
owned computers and monitors, as well as some other products.
This law mandated business in certain sectors to undertake
recycling initatives and incorporate 3Rs (Reuse, reduce, recycle)
into their business model. This law added a takeback fee to
purchase of new equipment (sold since 2003) which is collected
at purchase and paid to the manufacturers. Consumers attach
the label they receive when they pay the fee, then take it
to the post office (or have the PO pick it up). The Postal
system gets the product the proper recycler. (To recycle computers
purchased before 2003, the consumer must contact the manufacturer
to pay a fee and order a mail back label to the proper manufacturer,
then take the boxed equipment to the post office (or have
the PO pick it up).
Sony's
Double Standards
Sony proudly reports that in 2004, they exceeded the 55% recycling
goal for Sony TVs in Japan and recycled 86% of the amout they
collected.
Sony
states, "The Recycling Research Centerestablished
by Sony in October 1997and Green Cycle [a recycling
center owned by Sony] cooperate to conduct research on the
state of recycling in Japan. Feedback from such research
helps television designers and engineers create new products
that are easier to recycle." From Sony's 2005 Corporate
Social Responsibility Report, page 60. View Sony's
Report.
Sony
is also a leading member of Canada's Electronics Product Stewardship,
a corporation founded to be the leader in environmental waste
management for selected end-of-life electronics equipment.
Yet Sony opposes similar efforts in the United States, and
is a member of the coalition opposing producer takeback legislation
in the U.S.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|