|
|
|
Electronic
Waste Recycling - Why Current System Isn't Working
It's
hard to recycle such toxic products
Electronic
products contain a great many chemicals, many of them toxic,
plus specific toxic components, such as batteries and lamps
containing mercury. Often, these toxic components are very
difficult and time-consuming to remove. This is what makes
e-waste expensive and difficult to recycle. Recycling companies
using the best available processing technology still end up
sending a large portion of processed e-waste to smelters.
Smelters are a low-end and often dirty recycling option.
The
most effective way to recycle e-waste involves dismantling
by hand. Since e-waste recycling can be dangerous to workers
and therefore requires expensive safeguards, the best and
most environmentally sound recycling is also more expensive.
To
gain customers by offering cheaper services, many businesses
offering "recycling" services look for short cuts
and cheap options. This usually means recycling less of the
material, shortcutting worker safety, shipping the waste overseas
or using prison labor in the US.
As
long as the economic and regulatory conditions encourage (or
allow) low end "recycling" - export, prisons, or
dangerous working conditions - it will be hard to have a viable
recycling industry and truly sustainable system to address
e-waste. But the market driven system COULD work better if
there were effective standards and drivers in place, (including
laws requiring producer takeback, a ban on the export of e-waste
to developing countries, and restrictions on using prison
labor for recycling). And recycling would be much less expensive
if companies used less toxic materials in the first place.
|
|
Most
E-Waste isn't recycled
Less
than ten percent of discarded computers are currently recycled,
with the remainder stockpiled or disposed of improperly. Currently
the most lucrative 'solution' to this toxic waste problem
is usually to export it to developing countries. Fifty
to eighty percent of the e-waste collected for recycling is
being exported to developing countries, including China
and Nigeria, which have an inadequate infrastructure to accommodate
the hazardous properties of e-waste.
Due
to horrific working conditions and weak labor standards in
many of the developing countries where e-waste is sent, women
and children are often directly exposed to lead and other
hazardous materials when dismantling the electronic products
to recover valuable parts for resell. Workers in China disassembling
e-waste throw the unwanted leaded glass into former irrigation
ditches, and dump pure acids and dissolved heavy metals directly
into their rivers. Piles of wires are burned in open fires,
creating dioxins and furans.
|
|
|
| Woman
in Guiyu, China about to smash a cathode ray tube from
a computer monitor, to remove the copper yoke at the end
of the funnel. The glass is laden with lead but the biggest
hazard from this is the inhalation of the highly toxic
phosphor dust coating inside. December 2001. Copyright
Basel Action Network. |
|
|
More
Information about E-Waste Export Dumping
From the Basel Action Network - Two films and reports:
-
Exporting Harm - The High Tech Trashing of Asia Info
-
The Digital Dump - Exporting Reuse and Abuse to Africa
Info
-
Recycling of Electronic Waste in China and India: Workplace
and Environmental Contamination, from Greenpeace International.
Info
|
Use
of prison labor in recycling
Another
"low-road" practice is for recyclers to send their
products to prisons for disassembly. Prison workers usually
earn less than one dollar per hour, so use of prison labor
further undercuts our domestic recycling industry. Because
these "workers" are prisoners, they are not entitled
to collective bargaining rights, and are not automatically
protected by OSHA. And the prison recycling shops have had
some safety problems. E-waste recycling at Atwater prison
in California began operations in 2002, but has been shut
down several times, due to major health and safety problems,
including a major fire in 2003.
More
Information on E-waste recycling and prison labor:
Toxic
Sentence: E-Waste, Prisons, Economic and Environmental Justice
A fact sheet from the Computer Takeback Campaign. View
fact sheet (PDF).
Tale
of Two Systems: Corporate Strategies for Electronics Recycling.
This study by Silicon Valley Toxics Coalition compares two
very different e-waste recycling plants: the Micro Metallics
plant used by HP, and the Atwater Prison recycling plant,
run by the federal UNICOR program. (At the time of this report,
Dell was using this facility, but Dell no longer uses prison
recycling facilities.) View
Study (PDF).
|
See
How CRT TV's Are Recycled
In
Japan, the law requires TVs to be recycled by the manufacturers.
So while Panasonic is a leader in the fight against Producer
Responsibility laws in the US, in Japan, they proudly highlight
their recycling activities and achievements. Click
here to see their tour of how they recycle TVs in their
"METEC" recycling facility in Japan, and how resources
are recovered from CRT TVs.
|
|
|
|
|